Quantcast
Channel: United Kingdom
Viewing all 23154 articles
Browse latest View live

Dog 'Saves Children's Lives' During Road Rage Shooting In America

$
0
0
A German Shepherd is reported to have saved the lives of a car-full of children after it shielded them from bullets during a road rage incident.

The family's SUV was followed into the car park of a shop in Atlanta by the driver of another vehicle who had nearly collided with them earlier.

A witness said: "About five minutes later, they pulled back through they just rolled right up. You know what I’m saying? They pulled the gun out and started clapping."

dog shooting
The dog caught on CCTV


"They had hit the back of his car. Which the dog had jumped in front of the bullet I guess to save one of the children or the wife."

Tragically, the dog was caught on CCTV after being shot running around the back of a building where it died of its wounds.

One of those who witnessed the shooting said: "The dog took the bullet for the kids so the kids would be safe."

Atlanta Police Sgt. Gregory Lyon said: "They were fired upon and their family was terrorised and they survived that only to find that their pet is now gone. It’s sad for the whole family, especially the day after Thanksgiving."


If People Voted for Policies, the Green Party Would Win

$
0
0
It's been a two-horse race for such a long time in politics, that most people think it's a waste to vote for anyone else. The British public has become apathetic to change and votes tactically, if at all.

This attitude has lead to our country being run by a government that only 36% of us actually voted for.

Let's do something else this time.

The Green Party policies are the most popular, according to Vote for Policies.

2014-11-29-20141129voteforpolicies2.png


Almost half a million people have completed the survey at the time of writing. They chose their preferred policy out of a range of six, without knowing which parties they came from.

This site gives people a chance to see who they should vote for without prejudice. I recommend you give it a go for yourself.

It's probably as close to a blind test as we can get. Sites like this one are offering us a real chance to make voting about more than who makes the most noise.

Because that's what the General Elections mostly come down to: who makes the most noise. That's why Ukip is doing so well.

Everyday somebody from Ukip says something stupid or racist, sexist or homophobic. Everyday someone from Ukip does something awful. But this means that everyday, Ukip is on the tele or splashed across the front page of the dailies.

The Green Party doesn't say or do such atrocities. In fact, it's really quite sensible. It does good. But 'good' isn't news.

Opinion polls place the Greens in fourth place - but the results from the Vote for Policies survey show a much different picture:

Green Party 26.44%, Labour 20.12%, Lib Dems 16.87%, Conservatives 14.33%, Ukip 12.02% and BNP 10.22%.

So, if everybody loves Ukip so much, why is it brining up the rear with the BNP when it comes to policies?

Because it's a racist party with bad policies that most of the British public do not agree with.

Of the nine categories in the survey, the Green Party policies were voted best in four of them: crime, education, health and environment; and second best in four more: democracy, economy, immigration and welfare.

2014-11-29-20141129voteforpoliciesbreakdown.png

Ukip policies on the other hand are quite unpopular. Ukip finished third in one category: welfare; fourth in crime and economy; and fifth in the other six categories.

But despite most people preferring the Greens on paper, in real life we see the opposite.

I think a lot of it comes down to media coverage. In the run up to the European elections, we saw blanket coverage of Ukip. Everyday. All day. It was the Ukip Show for months. Almost never about its policies, of course, which would have been quite unpopular.

The party is total click-bait. The Green Party on the other hand isn't nearly as entertaining. Nobody is going to be outraged to hear about Caroline Lucas supporting her constituents and standing up for what's right. And outrage sells.

The Greens may or may not get the mainstream coverage it deserves in the run up to the 2015 elections, but members and supporters can start making noise of our own.

2014-11-29-IMG_3704.JPG

The Green Party recently passed 27,000 members. (Thanks the London Green Party for the image.) That's a lot of people. If we all started making noise, telling our social networks to at the very least check out Vote for Policies and see for themselves, then perhaps we could make a real difference.

We need to have faith. If everyone actually voted for the party whose policies they most agreed with, the Greens would have a real chance in the next election.

Of course, our electoral system is completely ridiculous and in the long run we'd be better to move to a system where people's votes were given the same weighting, regardless of where they live. But in the mean time, we just need to overcome the nation's apathy.

We need to vote for something we actually believe in.

Thinking About Phillip Hughes

$
0
0
Up until this week I'd always wanted Phillip Hughes to fail. It was nothing personal. As an aggressive Australian batsman he was an enemy in this blinkered English cricket fan's eyes. Those famous twin centuries against the likes of Morkel and Steyn were an indicator of his frightening potential. If he could do that to them, what would he do to us?

Though he subsequently never showed his best against England those early markers - aged just 20 - suggested the future would be his. Indeed, at the start of this week he was still the future of Australian batting, set to replace injured captain Michael Clarke in the first test against India on 4 December. After the tragic events of the last few days, his future is past.

Like millions of cricket fans I'm feeling both shocked and bereft, forever replaying in my mind those images of the last ball he would ever face. The attempted pull, the swivel, the hands on knees, the sudden collapse. Tribal loyalties were instantly cast aside: as new first filtered through of the critical condition he was in, I wanted the 25-year-old to come through like never before.

Confusion, bewilderment... I felt sickened when I woke up on Thursday to read that he hadn't. An elite sportsman about to enter his prime, a much loved son, brother and teammate gone, seemingly in an instant, with that instant captured on film and relayed around the world. My thoughts and prayers go to his family and loved ones, some of whom were actually watching from the stands at the Sydney Cricket Ground; to Sean Abbott too, that most unfortunate bowler to whom no blame can be attached. This was a tragically unlucky set of circumstances, the likelihood of their happening infinitesimally small the moment Abbott let go of the ball. And yet somehow they did.

Phillip Hughes' death is a tragedy on so many levels, not least the cutting down of a talent on the cusp of truly flourishing. But more, it's times like this that remind those of us with a tendency to get caught up in its ebbs and flows that sport is simply a game, no more no less, played by human beings of infinitely worth more than whatever scores they muster.

I've noted a couple things these shocking past few days. The shared sense of loss amid the cricket community, which has reacted with great dignity and humanity, exemplified by the collective arm around Abbott and the #putyourbatsout hashtag currently trending on Twitter. People care, want to do something, and have made what can be an unforgiving bear-pit an altogether more life-affirming place these last couple of days.

Related, but in addition, is the universal sense by all who encountered him that Hughes was simply a great guy; humble, hard working, uncomplaining when dropped, non-sledging, determined to make the most of the game he loved and excelled at.

It leaves with me with two hopes: one, that the animosity that has crept onto the cricket field in recent years (particularly but not exclusively in the Ashes contests) is toned down significantly and the game played in a more grace-filled, humane manner. Be competitive of course, but remember the context.

And two, that having his life cut so short gives all those affected an opportunity to reassess what really matters in theirs. We have limited time and I know I for one want to live more mindfully and thankfully, less judgementally and regretfully, make very effort to be the person I was intended to be.

He was 63 not out when it ended, but sheer volume of runs can never now be Phillip Hughes' legacy. A more compassionate future just might.

So Long, Soho?

$
0
0
Westminster Council's latest decision to close down Madame Jojo's (following a violent incident on its doorstep) has shone a light on their far more cynical plans to demolish a large area of Soho, one of London's most beloved, historical and characterful areas, and turn it into a Disney-Style Westfield-esque centre with identikit bars, shops and offices.

Soho - an area which has housed and inspired poets, artists, romantics for hundreds of years to become a sort of Times Square family friendly experience. Is this really what Londoners want?

Westminster Council will have us believe that their approval in December 2013 for 'Soho Estates' plans - to redevelop Soho's key areas, Walker's Court and Brewer Street - are "enhancing the area", making it "safer" for visitors. As a born and bred Londoner of 33 years who has spent a good chunk of my adult life in Soho I've never felt threatened there. Is it sanitary and clinical? No. Are their occasional drunken brawls and illicit substances consumed? Perhaps. Soho has a seedy charm. A Bacchanalian attitude. A libertine spirit. But with this also comes character, romance, poetry, history, and beauty. Soho was built on sex, art and culture - and we should cherish its idiosyncratic creativity, not strive to stifle it. And don't we have enough alternative areas in London for those looking for a sterilised and family friendly night out?

"Enhancing the area" they say. For whom exactly? For 'Soho Estates'? The property empire set up by Paul Raymond which owns over 60 acres of Soho and Central London and has an estate estimated to be worth over £370million? For the huge franchise owners looking to cash in with yet another outlet, as the "long standing antisocial uses" (e.g. the sex shops) are "legally removed from the site" and replaced with offices, a supermarket and New York style delis.

I don't know about you but to me the sex shops, the transvestites, and the burlesque bars are essential parts of the soul of Soho. I don't need a multi-millionaire puritan to tell me, a grown adult, whether these "antisocial uses" are good for me or not. Not a suitable area for children? Good. They can visit Buckingham Palace and Kensington Gardens instead.

Money, consumerism and greed. They are the only winners here. And as is so often the case beauty, culture, history and the everyday people are the losers.

And this latest cynical development is simply a symptom of a wider problem here in London - on nearly ever street corner there is a new build either being erected, or recently completed. Almost each and every one (in my opinion) an eye-sore, sticking out like a sore and unsightly thumb agains their older counterparts. Where once buildings were designed and built with care, love and attention to detail, now increasingly they are built with one eye on the bank balance and one on functionality. Its the same old story. Profit over aesthetic. The owners wallet getting steadily bigger as we, the people of London see our visual experience of our city ever diminishing.

I'm not against progress, i'm really not. My father is an architect, and I believe that with the right care and attention new builds could be a beautiful addition to the London vista. But who can we trust anymore to make those decisions on our behalf?

Our councils are supposed to protect us, but increasingly this seems not to be the case. Only recently on my own doorstep plans for a 3 storey block of flats, replacing a beautiful village-like corner filled with independents shops and characters were approved. More and more plans to demolish sites of cultural importance - music venues, art galleries, historic pubs to name but a few - are being passed. Buffalo Bar, Madame Jojo's, Vibe Bar and The George Tavern are just a few familiar names that look set to join the graveyard of once loved London institutions such as Astoria, Turnmills and Hammersmith Palais.

Dylan Thomas once called Swansea an "ugly, lovely town" and in many ways this is how I grew up seeing London. Its areas like Soho providing a beautiful dose of grit and grime in its cracked walls and faces.

But without legislation preventing councils from passing plans to destroy what little we have left to cherish, without Londoners having the power to insist that buildings of cultural and historic importance (as decided by them) become listed buildings, beyond the grubby reach of the greedy fat cats' fingers, then soon there may be no "lovely" left at all. London may simply become that ugly, and yes rich, town that we once all used to love.

The Antis Need to 'Back Off', But We Need to Talk About Abortion

$
0
0
In the UK we don't talk about abortion; not like they do in the United States. Our election campaigns aren't hijacked by the abortion debate and we don't see hundreds of our politicians totally preoccupied with passing legislation restricting abortion. We probably don't even know what our own MPs think about abortion because 99% of the time it just isn't a thing.

The biggest anti-abortion organisations are so aware of how badly their messages play in the UK,that they are not even out and proud with their agenda: operating mainly at the level of obfuscation and misinformation. Unlike in the US, clinic staff here don't need armed escorts and bullet proof windows and, thankfully, we don't have to bury beloved family members who have been murdered by fanatics, whipped into a frenzy in the 'by any means necessary' environment created by even the most mainstream anti-abortion groups.

Since 1967 in England, Scotland and Wales women have been able to access safe and legal abortion without risk to life and health, and that's how the majority of us want it to stay. This consensus has resulted in a kind of complacency and little discussion of abortion in the UK. Looking at the US model of 'debate' this has largely seemed like a good thing.

Now we do have to start talking about abortion. Not just because we seem to have forgotten the important role legal abortion has played in saving women's lives, and facilitating our participation in the economic, social and cultural life of the country. Not just because we still have work to do to extend this right to women in Northern Ireland. Not just to end the stigma that ludicrously still surrounds a safe, legal procedure experienced by one in three women. Not just because those campaigning against abortion keep forgetting that if you pan out from that foetus they want to save, you'll see a walking, talking woman with moral agency, responsibilities and relationships, and the best possible intelligence about whether having a child right now is a good idea.

No. We need to talk about abortion because the phoney war (small groups of vigil-antis outside clinics, praying, thrusting rosary beads and plastic foetuses into women's hands, giving out leaflets packed with fake science and scare stories) - is over. For the first time an anti-abortion group has declared real war on abortion clinics with new levels of harassment that have left staff feeling beleaguered, and women intimidated, invaded and upset.

They are lining the streets around clinics with vast photographs of bloody foetuses, approaching staff and members of the public and filming them on discretely positioned cameras without their consent. They are challenging women about the treatment they are seeking and following women down the street with complete disregard for their privacy and sense of safety, causing as much distress as they can. They have learned from their American colleagues that if you can't make accessing or providing an abortion legally impossible, then you should aim to make it intolerable.

In response to this intensification of clinic protests, abortion provider Bpas has launched the 'back off' campaign. The campaign calls on the government to create protest-free access zones directly around clinics - to allow staff and members of the public safe passage as they come and go.

The protestors have, of course, cried foul. They claim that their right to free speech entitles them to follow and film women and speak right up close in their faces: even claim that these invasive tactics are 'empowering' for women. But as bpas Director Ann Furedi says, 'women arriving at clinics aren't coming for a debate. They are coming to access a confidential medical service, and should be left alone.'

Access zones do not need to compromise free speech. If anything, having to respond to this ugly new development in protest should encourage us all to engage in the debate - just not right outside clinics, please. It may mean debating with people who deliberately misinform us, who try to shame us, and whose views we find deeply offensive. But we know from the American experience we can't turn a blind eye to abortion opponents and just hope they'll go away. If we want to protect our rights, we really do need to talk about how much we cherish them. We need to talk about abortion.

Some Thoughts on Charity at Christmastime

$
0
0
Every year, as we approach Christmas, a privileged guilt sweeps over the more fortunate individuals in our society. This guilt is galvanized, of course, when we stare at the unnecessary items of indulgence that form a pile in our shopping trolleys in the final weeks of December. This pile consists of overpriced alcohol for our 11 am tipple on Christmas morning; unnecessary presents that will rest underneath an elaborate conifer dressed in garish decorations; free-range wild turkeys, organic vegetables and, of course, the utterly essential pigs-in-blankets for our mammoth chow-downs on Christmas afternoon. It's unsurprising, therefore, that these profligate bouts of unadulterated consumerism have us feeling a little guilty about those less fortunate than ourselves.

The guilt that encompasses the fortunate ones this time of year invites one of two different reactions. The first reaction is an immediate disregard for this accidental guilt. One attempts to turn a blind eye to the suffering that is far more evident this time of year - such as the surfeit of orphaned dog adverts, the multitude of snowed-in homeless folk outside Selfridges and that Godforsaken Band Aid medley. It might be difficult to ignore the suffering, but it's not impossible, especially if one utilizes the abundance of overpriced alcohol that is sure to be at one's disposal. Drinking always makes apathy easier. That's why drunks, for the most part, are such terrible listeners.

The second option is to relieve this guilt with a small, insignificant donation to a local or national charity. Some folks might go further and donate a large amount or, if they are feeling particularly generous, donate some of their free time. One might turn up at a soup kitchen or take some old clothes to a homeless shelter.

It would seem obvious that the latter of these choices - the donation of time and money - is immediately preferable to the former - alcohol-induced apathy. And yet a particularly influential Irishman would disagree. Oscar Wilde, in his brilliant essay The Soul of Man Under Socialism, argues that charity is capitalist hypocrisy at its finest. For Wilde, those who attempt to obfuscate the prejudices of the capitalist system through small, meaningless donations are in actuality contradicting themselves. If they really cared, Wilde argues, they would attempt to overthrow capitalism in favour of a fairer system. Wilde, in essence, refused to support charity as he believed that fidelity to a more progressive political system could obliterate poverty and thus the necessity for charity. Charity, apparently, is selfish appeasement and nothing more.

Wilde famously claims that 'to live is the rarest thing in the world. Most people exist, that is all.' Wilde is arguing that poverty condemns so many people to a standard of life that is incompatible with the grand, abstruse Wildean idea of 'living'. Far from alleviating the symptoms of capitalism - poverty, homelessness and so on - charity simply prolongs these symptoms to ensure that people 'exist' rather than 'live'. Charity alone is unable to fix the inherent problems of capitalism. In order to counter these issues, Wilde maintains, we need to 'reconstruct society on such a basis that poverty will be impossible.'

It's interesting, at this time of year, to consider Wilde's hypothesis. Right now, in Tory Britain, we have one in four children living in poverty. We have more homelessness, more people using food banks and an ever-increasing gap of inequality. Many people - democratically speaking the majority - support such a system. Many of these people - good, decent people - will donate money and will claim, however spuriously, to support those less fortunate. For Wilde, these folks are hypocrites and if they really cared, they would alter the system.

I, unlike Wilde, believe that charity is an earnest act of good nature. It's difficult to deny, however, that Wilde has a point. If we want to stamp out homelessness, and poverty, and starvation, and all of the other problems we are currently facing, the answer doesn't lie in a donation once a year. If we really want to challenge these social ills, we have to bond together and stand in solidarity with the less fortunate - all year round - and attempt, as Wilde so poignantly claims, to reconstruct a society in which 'poverty is impossible'. For now, however, before you start sharpening your pitchforks, if you've got a little something spare - time, money or clothes - try to ignore Oscar's wild ramblings and help someone less fortunate than yourself.

Rural Retreats: Cowley Manor, Cotswolds

$
0
0
It's the attention to detail that makes Cowley Manor stand out.

The rack of Hunter wellies at the door, to wear while you stroll around the exquisite Grade II listed gardens. The golden triple cooked chips that compliment the club sandwich. The funky, Scando-style rugs and throws. From the service to the salt cellars, everything feels like it's been carefully and lovingly thought out.

2014-11-26-CowleyManorExterior.jpg


Cowley is cosy and chic on the inside, but the exteriors of the 19th century manor house are gloriously untouched. There are 55 acres of land to explore, including two large lakes, a 13th century church, and a stunning old fountain lined with stone lions. We were lucky enough to spot a deer darting through the woods, too.

Despite the size of the land, Cowley has just 30 bedrooms, so you can wander the wild, country gardens with a rare sense of privacy and solitude - you really do feel like you've been transported back to another era. Indeed Lewis Carroll, a regular visitor to the village of Cowley, was said to have been inspired to write Alice in Wonderland while walking in these grounds.
Staff are relaxed but attentive - no one batted an eyelid when we asked for our puddings to be sent to our bedroom after dinner. Along with the restaurant, there is a sleek bar area, billiards room, and a sitting room with gloriously comfy sofas, newspapers, and windows looking out over the lake.

The Room

There are 15 rooms in the main house and another 15 in the stable blocks, some of which are split over two or three levels. All are generously sized and impeccably curated, combining original features such as stone fireplaces with contemporary furniture and fabrics, enormous beds and Bose docking stations (there are ready-stocked iPods to borrow from reception). For me the pièce de résistance was the spacious bathroom, which had warm wooden floors, a big bath and gorgeous views of the lake. For knock-out luxury, book the 'Best' room which boasts a four poster bed, double bathtub and large private terrace.

2014-11-26-CowleyManorBathroom.jpg


The Spa

Nestled tastefully to the rear of the main house is the glass fronted C-Spa. There's an indoor pool with a lovely green slated bottom, big enough to do decent lengths in, and a heated outdoor pool - heavenly on a crisp sunny November morning. There's also a gym, steam room, sauna and four treatment rooms. In the summer, you can eat and sunbathe outside on the terrace.

2014-11-26-CowleyManorPool3.jpg


The Treatment

Green and Spring Massage

A one hour body massage, incorporating elements of acupressure and reflexology and using Green & Spring products, made from local, natural resources, including the spring waters and herbs found in the grounds of Cowley. The massage was masterful, and the oils were refreshing and subtle. You can choose your own music, too.

To Eat

The hotel restaurant is an impressive space with stunning high ceilings and oak panelled walls. Again, there's that wonderful sense of space. Each table has plenty of room and plenty of attention from the charming staff. The modern British menu is of very high quality and has been recognised for its use of sustainable, locally sourced food. We feasted on Dorset crab, venison and partridge. An excellent cooked breakfast is included in the room rate, served in the restaurant - grab a table by the window for one last look at the grounds.

2014-11-26-CowleyManorRestaurant.jpg


Don't Miss

Look out for the sculptures dotted through the grounds, part of the annual Cowley Manor Arts Award.

The Deal

Two people can enjoy a night's stay at Cowley Manor, a 30minute spa treatment, three-course dinner and breakfast, from £335 staying Sunday to Thursday or £405 on weekends.

www.cowleymanor.com

Words: Chloe Lambert

www.the-spa-spy.com

My Top Ten Homemade Foodie Gifts

$
0
0
2014-11-28-homemadeferrerorocher.jpg

Image by Holly Bell

One of the best Christmas presents we receive each year is a hamper. It's handmade by the Godparents of our sons and usually contains some biscuits, truffles, chutney and crackers. I look forward to seeing what's in this hamper weeks before Christmas.

Now I know it's not an easy option, especially given that a lot of hamper contents have a short shelf life, but it really is one of the those presents that makes the hair stand up on your arms. To think someone has gone to all that trouble... just for you. I don't want to come over all soppy, but it really is the spirit of Christmas.

With this in mind I thought I'd offer up a few ideas to include in a Christmas hamper for someone very special. (If you're into edible gifts there's a whole chapter in my book, Recipes from a Normal Mum, including Bell blend garam masala, dukkah, Lady Grey gin and strawberry rose jam).

Oh and I am also teaching a class at Leiths all about edible gifts. It's next Saturday in London and promises to be great fun. If you fancy coming along to bake, gossip and put the world to rights, take a look here for details of how to book.

1) A Christmas pudding

Now, I know many people will have made provision for Christmas pud either by buying or some folks making them ahead, but the lovely thing about an extra Christmas pudding is that, well, you have plenty more. And also you can stow one away under the bed for next Christmas. It's paying it forward in the ultimate way. My traditional one is here. Or there's a pecan and cherry one for those who aren't so into peel.

2) Truffles

They're incredibly easy to make (kids can and will make them - if you have some, scrub their hands and set them to work) and are almost universally liked. Plus you can make a large batch of truffle mixture and then portion it off for mixing in different booze. My homemade Ferrero Rocher are something a bit different. If you want a traditional truffle then try my chocolate orange ones (ignore the eye ball detail, just leave it out), or my Baileys fridge cake ones or my Christmas ones.

3) A mini Christmas cake

Last year I went a bit mad and made a small Christmas cake for anyone I could think of who didn't live in a large family type arrangement. I'm not sure if this is offensive or welcome to most, but my almost 90 year old Nanna told me it was just the ticket, as she can never face finishing off a whole Christmas cake. If you are making the hamper for a larger family then just make a regular sized one instead. My recipe is easy and can be made up until a few days before. It doesn't need to mature though will do so happily if you're organised.

4) A baked treat

You could make some mince pies, either with melting moment topping or crumble topping or just regular old mince pies with no topping other than pastry. You could even make some with homemade drunken cherry brandy mincemeat. Or you could make some little Rudolf morsels, pastry cases filled with a little jam and some marzipan. Or some Christmas flapjacks... Or Christmas spiced scones... Or lemon button biscuits... Or rocky road florentines... Or if you're a sadist then perhaps macarons.

5) Stir up vodka/gin

Imagine Christmas pudding with less calories, in a drink format and very, very alcoholic. Here she is. Add a bottle of something fizzy and you're half way to hamper heaven. You're welcome.

6) Chutney

For some reason I seem to always have lots of rhubarb in my freezer, in chunks, ready for stewing or making into this rhubarb and ginger chutney. You could substitute the fruit for apples or plums instead if rhubarb isn't your thing or you can't get your mitts on it. Or beetroot and onion relish is earthy and perfect for winter sandwiches. Do ensure you include a small cheese in the hamper. A chutney without cheese is a sad thing.

7) Granola

A granola is almost always a welcome gift at Christmas time. The season of excess feels ever so slightly less likely to induce gout when every day starts with some seeds, fruit and nuts. Pecan and hazelnut is a great combo. Almond and fig equally so. Pop it in a pretty jar with a ribbon for extra Kirstie Allsop points.

8) Cut out iced biscuits

These biscuits are very good for making those pretty cut outs. You can ice them to look like baubles, Father Christmas, candy canes; really just use your imagination or steal some ideas from Pinterest. The dough is very useful and if you have too much simply freeze it.

9) Breadsticks

Make some cheesy or sesame breadsticks. Pretty much the perfect festive snack for munching on the sofa in front of old films. Perhaps provide some parma ham for the non veggies to wrap around theirs. Or if you're feeling in the mood to bake then this beery walnut bread is really lovely with yet more cheese.

10) Hot chocolate

Proper hot chocolate can only be made in one way, in my humble opinion, and that is with real chocolate. These hot chocolate sticks are very easy to make. Add whatever flavours you like - Aero for a mint chocolate stick or marshmallows or some ground hazelnuts.

Holly blogs at Recipes from a Normal Mum

Her first book is out now, also called Recipes from a Normal Mum

HIV Testing Saves Lives: But Is HIV Testing the Best Prevention?

$
0
0


Let me answer the question I pose in the title of this post straight away: I think the answer is a most resounding yes. But more of that later ....

"I usually get a lot of retweets, favourites and mentions whenever I put something out on Twitter," said England under-21s captain and Stoke goalkeeper Jack Butland to me this week. "But whenever I tweet about this, the relative silence is really noticeable."

Those unresponded-to tweets of Captain Jack's (cue tip of the hat to Doctor Who) were, of course, about HIV. This past week has been National HIV Testing Week, and Saving Lives has been supporting sexual health services across the country to promote HIV testing and try to drive down the figure which always surprises people when they first hear it: that a quarter of the 110,000 people living with HIV in the UK do not know they have it.

Someone living with undiagnosed HIV will get sicker than they need to be; they have a much lower chance of living a long life; and they may well unknowingly pass on the infection to their partners. That is, the spread of HIV is being enabled by ignorance.

Four years ago to this day, we launched a campaign and a charity with the tag line "HIV TESTING SAVES LIVES". But unlike other campaigns I had worked on, something was different about this one: it appeared to be more acceptable to the general public.

Why did that campaign work for us when so many others failed to make an impact? I believe the reason was simple: it saw past sex and through to sexual health. It avoided the moralising and judgemental reactions we received every time we dared to mention the S word.

Frustrated by knocking our heads against brick walls year after year we finally appeared to be onto something. Something tangible, a call to action ("Get Tested") and a promise that, if you responded, you could achieve something ("Save Lives"). A test can extend your own life, and, if you can to get somebody else to take the test, maybe you can save their life, too.

Maybe that's why at last we have been getting some traction with the wider public. It's a very fine line, though, and one which we are still feeling our way along.

This year we have had more sports personalities endorse the message that HIV Testing Saves Lives than ever. See our poster: "18 sports stars say HIV Testing Saves Lives" (hi-res download - feel free to print and use!).

Are we starting to see the tide of HIV acceptance change? Maybe. But then again - think back to Jack - maybe not.

That's why the awareness-raising we and many others have been doing this week is truly crucial in the fight against HIV: because the stigma that surrounds the infection, and that at least one of our celebrity ambassadors has noticed on social media in this last week, drives a reluctance to test which actively promotes the continued spread of HIV.

Figures released in the last few weeks by Public Health England underscore the fact that HIV continues to grow in the UK, and that in many ways it continues to do so silently.

There are a range of prevention strategies that have been proposed, ranging from abstinence (a great favourite of George W Bush) to more widespread condom use (very effective although not consistently employed); from treatment of STIs to circumcision and more recently Pre Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP). All of these work to a greater or lesser extent, and all have their place. We must have a broad and varied approach to HIV prevention.

However, for me two recent studies are real game-changers for HIV prevention efforts and Treatment As Prevention (or TASP). The snappily-named US study, HPTN 052, established in 2011 that the efficacy of antiretroviral therapy at reducing HIV transmission from the HIV-positive partner to the HIV-negative one was at least 96% in heterosexual couples, but had too few gay couples in it to establish if the same applied to them a higher figure than all of the prevention strategies listed above.

The second study, which has only reported interim data earlier this year, was perhaps even more exciting. The Partner study enrolled couples in discordant relationships (that is, one in which one partner is positive whilst the other is negative), and recorded the numbers of sexual acts, the types of sex, the rate of condom use or otherwise, that occurred over the period of a year.

The entry criteria was that the positive partner had to have an undetectable viral load and be stable on treatment - and, oh they also had to be having unprotected sex (a consensual decision, of course). 767 couples took part in this two-year interim analysis, forty per cent of whom were gay couples. A staggering 28,000 acts of unprotected sex were reported in the heterosexual couples and 16,400 acts of unprotected sex were reported in homosexual couples.

After just over one year of follow-up, guess how many new infections occurred. What do you think? 50? 100? 200?

Well, thus far there have been none. That's correct: zero. This is not the same as saying transmission cannot occur from a person on treatment. and these are interim data. Nevertheless, these results do go some way to explaining why the majority of new infections in this country are from people who are 1) not on treatment; and 2) unaware of their infection.

So treatment as prevention will almost certainly work. But here's the rub: it is impossible not to return to that twenty-five per cent figure, that one person in every four living with HIV who simply are not aware that they are already infected. In some communities, the rate of undiagnosed HIV is even higher.

In 2013, 31% of black African heterosexual women and 38% of black African heterosexual men who had HIV were unaware of their infection.

Rates of undiagnosed infection were somewhat lower among heterosexual people of other ethnicities: 27% in men and 23% in women.

Ultimately, treatment will not help the partner of someone with undiagnosed HIV.

It is important, then, that all of us interested in arresting the spread of this virus focus squarely on driving down the number of people who do not know they are infected. How, though, to reach those people who should be taking the test and yet, for whatever reason, are not?

There are many charities and NHS services doing just that, and they do so within different communities and in different ways. But what many of these approaches have in common is the breaking down of barriers, the reduction of stigma and the promotion of an idea that HIV is nothing to be ashamed about.

Entrenched opinions, often backed up by deeply-held cultural assumptions, are not easy to change. It is, however, essential that we challenge them. In one way, this is simple: there are clear messages that correct many of the myths that surround HIV testing.

Anyone can contract HIV. Anyone who has had unprotected sex is at risk.

The test is not painful, and it is not difficult to access: go to your hospital, or a GP, or a confidential sexual health clinic and simply ask for the test.

Just taking the test in no way affects your chances of getting life insurance of a mortgage. (Like any chronic condition, actually having HIV can have an effect - but there are specialist providers who can help.)

HIV has no moral dimension. It is a virus, and it knows no boundaries of class or caste, gender or sexuality. My patients come from all walks of life, and none are defined by their condition.

These messages have the benefit of real clarity. They can be, however, difficult to get heard, as our ambassador found this week. People switch off, assume the message is not for them, or simply do not want to know. But that is precisely where talking about HIV in new ways, via new people, and in new contexts, can help.

Saving Lives has been running a 'Selfies Saving Lives' campaign for National HIV Testing Week, which sees Premiership footballers, famous medics, Olympic medallists, positive people, and members of the public all join forces to take a photograph of themselves holding a card bearing a simple sentence: HIV testing saves lives.

By associating HIV with positive community-building online, with open dialogue and friendly language, and with, yes, the healthy bodies of famous sportspeople, we are attempting to break down the prejudice that unfairly surrounds the virus and those that live with it.

When we place our ambassadors on the sides of buses, half of all those who then attend clinic as a result of our posters report no other exposure to sexual health messaging of any kind. This is absolutely key: reaching new people, getting fresh individuals through the door to take that test.

Only in that way can we diagnose the cases of HIV which are currently going undiagnosed. Only in this way can we prevent the further spread of this still life-threatening virus. And only in this way we can diagnose HIV earlier, and prescribe today's life-saving medicine when it needs to be taken.

We hope, then, to ensure that next year our ambassador gets a few more retweets for his awareness-raising. Because, put very simply, HIV testing is HIV prevention - and saves lives.

Reference
Rodger A et al. HIV transmission risk through condomless sex if HIV+ partner on suppressive ART: PARTNER study. 21st Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, Boston, abstract 153LB, 2014

Cyber Monday Is Every Day: 6 Warnings That Online Shopping Has Become Too Easy, Too Fast

$
0
0
The 1st December is Cyber Monday, which is set to be the biggest day of the year for online shopping.

It is noticeably different from Black Friday - the day after Thanksgiving in America, when many people are on holiday and visit shops to search for pre-Christmas discounts.

Cyber Monday is the peak time of the year for eCommerce. In 2013, it was the biggest online shopping day in history, according to IBM, and this year it's set to be even bigger as more people choose to shop through a computer, tablet or smartphone.

The UK is at the forefront of this: 90% of internet users in the UK now shop online, ahead of 70% in the US, according to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

Thanks to developments like super-fast broadband, the explosion in online shopping has been so rapid that there are still murky, unresolved issues around privacy and payment details, although big companies like Google and Apple are starting to offer clearer information to shoppers.

Here are six signs why online shopping may have become too easy, too fast, from Andrew Wyckoff, head of the Directorate for Science, Technology and Innovation at the OECD.

Vigilante 'Oath Keepers' Offering Free Security In Ferguson Told To Stand Down By St. Louis Police

$
0
0
NEW YORK -- A group of vigilantes who have been offering free security to shops and businesses in the suburb of Ferguson, Missouri, have been told to end their watch by local police after a weekend of rising tensions.

Called the Oath Keepers, the makeshift militia, which is comprised of former military and emergency service personnel, have been standing guard on rooftops and outside shops during the unrest that has seen mass looting, rioting and arson.

Fearing further clashes over the weekend officers from the St. Louis County Police demanded members of the group abandon their posts on Saturday or face arrest.

Speaking to the New York Times, a police spokesman said: “When we hear information that someone, or a group, is providing security without a license, our department has to investigate the issue.”

The Oath Keepers had been patrolling an area close to Florissant Road, which includes a number of small businesses and residential apartments.




Following last week’s decision by the Grand Jury not to indict police officer Darren Wilson over the shooting of teenager Michael Brown, parts of the St. Louis suburb were reduced to a smoldering warzone. More than 12 buildings were set alight by rioters, while cars were upturned and shops that were not set ablaze were looted and vandalised.

St. Louis County Police Chief Jon Belmar, who reported more than 150 gunshots during the evening (none from police), said: “What I've seen tonight is probably much worse than the worst night we had in August," referring to the initial riots after Brown’s death earlier this year.

Speaking to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, dentist Victor Clark, who had received protection from the Oath Keepers, said he wanted members of the militia to remain after rioters broke down the front door to his business.

“We didn't know that much about them [the Oath Keepers], but we got a feeling of trust,” he said. “You have to do something to protect our building.”

However, the group's seemingly honourable work to save the shops and apartments of Ferguson may conceal a slightly darker intent, with the Daily Beast reporting that the libertarian group was established in the early days of the Obama administration amid right-wing rhetoric of standing armed alongside citizens against agencies of the US government.


SEE ALSO:










Russell Brand Joins New Era Estate Protest In Downing Street March

$
0
0
Comedian Russell Brand has joined hundreds of residents from an east London estate to march on Downing Street protesting against the threat of eviction.

Tenants in the New Era estate in Hoxton, which was originally built as affordable housing for workers, say they could face homelessness after it was bought out by US investment firm Westbrook Partners.

Up to 93 families are reported to face eviction before Christmas, with resident Lindsey Garrett describing it as "social cleansing", adding: "It's forcing ordinary, working-class people out of London."

russell brand new era protest
Russell Brand with residents from the New Era Estate in Hoxton on Monday


It has been reported the company intends to refurbish the properties and rent them out at three times their current value.

Brand joined protesters at Westbrook’s headquarters in Mayfair and marched on to deliver a petition of nearly 300,000 signatures demanding rents are kept at affordable rates, to Number 10.



In a The Trews video recorded ahead of the march, Brand said: “The thing about Westbrook is they’re known throughout the world as predatory landlords, they’ve done this kind of stuff in New York City.”

He then ran a clip of himself interviewing New York mayor Bill De Blasio, who says: “Sometimes it’s fair to say there’s a limit on how much profit you should make because you shouldn’t want to dislocate people from their lives.”

Brand replies: “That’s pretty good, that sounds like a condemnation of Westbrook from the mayor of New York City to me.”




He adds: “We’ve seen very clearly the mayor of New York is prepared to back Londoners in their fight against these villainous developers Westbrook. If the mayor of New York will back Londoners, will Boris Johnson back Londoners?”

One of the campaigners directly addresses Johnson and says: “The people of London voted you in, stand up and help the people that actually put you in the position of power.”

Westbrook said in a statement Monday: "There will be no changes to their residential leases and no increases in rents during the first half of 2015," and that it will address residents' concerns.


Black Friday Sales - A Fine Example of Unadulterated Capitalism

$
0
0
Everyone loves sales. Whether it's the latest Xbox game, kitchen appliance or electronic gadget, people are always looking for bargains, especially during the run up to Christmas. But there's a stark difference between lining up for Boxing Day sales and the animalistic behaviour witnessed last week during the "Black Friday" sales.

People, who I assume on any other normal day, would queue up like civilised human beings, trampled and wrestled with one another over flat screen TVs. The scenes that were broadcasted all over the media, was something you'd expect to see in a WWE Royal Rumble. Shoppers were injured as a result, and in many towns and cities, police were called to the shops to contain the bargain hunting zombies.

One would think that the era of slavery was an embarrassing chapter in the history books of the "civilised West", but the Black Friday sales was a testimony that psychological slavery over material possessions was very much alive in Britain and the US. The retailers being the "slave owners" in this case and the goods on sale being the prize; subconscious slaves of capitalism lost all sense of rationality when they saw "50% OFF!" and "BUY ONE GET ONE FREE!" signs on merchandises.

Origin of Black Friday

Black Friday is the day after the American national holiday of "Thanksgiving" - a day of appreciation for the harvest of the preceding year. It is celebrated on the fourth Thursday of November in the US and on the second Monday of October in Canada. Black Friday in a nutshell, is the beginning of the Christmas shopping season, where retailers open very early and offer promotional sales - sales that usually last throughout the whole "festive period" and after. Amazon brought the event into the UK in 2010 and this year most of Britain's biggest retailers - Curry's, Littlewoods, Asda, Argos, John Lewis and Tesco's all offered discounts.

But Black Friday's origin goes back to 1869 during the first financial crisis in the US, where two speculators - Jay Gould and James Fisk tried to disrupt the gold market on the New York Gold Exchange. Gould and Fisk hoarded large amounts of gold which caused the price of the precious metal to rocket and stocks to plummet. Consequently, the price of gold collapsed during the era of reconstruction after the American Civil War.

In essence, the term "Black Friday" symbolised a political scandal when America's capitalist economic system was at the brink of destruction. Numerous measures were taken to overcome this crisis such as the mass sale of wheat to Europe, and the alleged selling of slaves at reduced prices to help plantation owners recover from the recession. Many businesses at the time used red ink to mark losses and black ink to mark profits, so in actuality, "Black Friday" was when retailers' losses turned to profit as a result of discounted sales.

Capitalism's enslavement of the mind

There is not much difference between the frenzied consumers of today and 1869. Whilst consumers believe they are winning over the retailers, in actual fact it is the other way round. Ordinary folks are manipulated into thinking that they are taking advantage of what appears to be 'no brainer' deals, making the 'proletariat', for once, the victors over the overbearing prices set by the 'bourgeois' retailers.

However, the rationality which people apply in their everyday duties and decision making goes out of the window, and those who are rugby tackling people to get their hands on an HD TV, become subconsciously overwhelmed by the seductive nature of materialism. The scenes from the Black Friday sales were an example of the uncivilised and primitive behaviour created by capitalism. The individualistic outlook in secular liberal societies in the West is bankrupt of a higher sense of purpose and ethical depth, except to "live life to the fullest" and gain as much wealth and material possessions as you can. The never-ending pursuit for worldly pleasures can affect us all, and that's expected as we are influenced by the dominant ideology of the society in which we inhabit.

It's rather ironic how our minds are indoctrinated to direct our sense of fashion, entertainment and even diet in a society that prides itself in freedom of choice. The reality we are oblivious of is our slavery to branded inanimates and desirable trends. Indeed capitalism is a grave offence on the human intellect and a mighty distraction to truly think independently and liberate the self. It appears rather, we have sold our minds for half price!

Action on the Environment Is Too Important to Be Used as a Political Football

$
0
0
Once the Autumn Statement is out later this week, the momentum towards the upcoming General Election in the UK will be gathering pace. So far, the political and media discourse around the election has been marked by a certain amount of uncertainty and negativity about the future social and economic situation in the UK.

This is understandable up to a point. Whilst the UK economy has performed much better recently compared to what many analysts had predicted and has recovered all of the output lost in the 'Great Recession' six years ago, there have arguably not been comparable gains for society or the environment. But going forward, the tone of the political debate doesn't have to remain so downbeat.

Looking ahead to the next 5 years, there are many areas that offer promising opportunities for the UK's continued economic recovery. Whilst rarely on top of many parties' priorities on the campaign trail, the environmental agenda is undoubtedly one of them. That's why today, the Aldersgate Group, whose business members have a collective global turnover in excess of £300bn, launched its manifesto for the General Election. In it, we urge politicians of all parties to take environmental issues seriously from pushing ahead with the transition to an efficient and low-carbon economy, to improving the UK's natural capital and accelerating the move towards a circular economy.

There is no shortage of evidence showing that coherent and ambitious action on the environment makes economic sense. A recent report from Cambridge Econometrics showed for instance that by investing in the infrastructure that will help us cut our emissions of greenhouse gases in line with the first four 'carbon budgets' recommended by the Committee on Climate Change, the UK's GDP, employment levels and average household income would all be higher in net terms by 2030 compared to a situation where little was done to reduce emissions.

When it comes to the circular economy, a report this year by the All Party Parliamentary Sustainable Resource Group found that reducing material waste and increasing the remanufacturing of components could represent a value worth of up to £5.6bn for the UK.

There is an equally compelling case for protecting and restoring the UK's natural environment, on which businesses are often highly dependent. Take the example of water: it takes 134 litres of water to produce a single cup of coffee and 50,000 litres to manufacture a car. As the business-led Ecosystems Market Services Taskforce found last year, improving our awareness of businesses' reliance on nature and understanding that we can't just rely on key natural services such as water being available in the future will help "drive innovation, increase resilience and enhance competitiveness".

And of course, action to protect the environment has never been so urgent. This election will choose the parliament that will take us to 2020, widely seen as the last period in which the world economy can implement sufficient decarbonisation programmes to avoid dangerous levels of climate change.
But the benefits of taking strong action on the environmental agenda will only materialise if we can provide a sufficiently supportive policy framework to attract the investment we need in environmental projects at an affordable cost and equip our workforce with the skills needed to take part in these promising growth areas.

This, in turn, requires three ingredients that lie at the core of our manifesto: providing policy stability, which requires continued and growing cross-party political support for the environmental agenda; ensuring that the ambition of Government action on the environment is in keeping with the severity of the economic damage that continued environmental degradation threatens; and proactively looking at those parts of the environmental agenda where the UK is well positioned to derive significant economic value from having ambitious policies in place.

Coherent and long-term policy making on the environment is worth the prize. It doesn't just make sense for nature and the economy; society will benefit too. As we argued in our recent Economy That Works report, environmental policies are also key to delivering important social benefits such as better health and wellbeing from cleaner air.

Put simply, the value of nature is too important in its own right, our economy and people's lives to be used as a political football.

The Antidote to Climate Despair?

$
0
0
Climate policy is failing. Climate scientists know it, environmental activists know it, even politicians know it. There is a pervading sense of despair and resignation amongst those who are paying attention at all, as we continue towards the irreversible destabilisation of the familiar, benign climate in which civilisation developed.

But all hopelessness contains a spark of potential: if despair is perceiving an undesirable future as inevitable, then one glimpse of a realistic alternative can ignite a burning drive towards that possibility.

It was in this context that Professor Kevin Anderson, Deputy Director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, hosted December 2013's Radical Emissions Reductions conference at the Royal Society in London. His rallying cry was that only radical options remain - fundamentally changing our planet's climate is about as radical as you get, yet avoiding that outcome may require previously unthinkable changes to our economic system. This conference was an invitation to openly discuss the radical ideas that are rapidly becoming our only sane options.

In this article Shaun Chamberlin, a colleague working with me on an Oxford University research project, explains one such option that emerged at that event, and how it can ignite that spark of hope.

Prof. Anderson opened the Radical Emissions Reduction conference with convincing evidence that even rapid growth in renewable energy supply simply cannot deliver the necessary rate of emissions reductions - the science is clear that energy consumption must also reduce.

TEQs (Tradable Energy Quotas) is a proposed policy to make this feasible that was much discussed there: one of those simple ideas that becomes more beautiful the more you think through the implications. It involves a country capping its economy's fuel and electricity consumption in line with the national carbon emissions targets, and then essentially rationing out the energy available under the cap, but with trading of the electronic ration units permitted. This tradability preserves what's good and popular about rationing - guaranteed minimum shares for all - while doing away with what is not - absolute limits to what people are allowed to consume and the unnecessary criminalisation of ordinary people who wish to trade. Since consumption must reduce, the alternative is our current system of 'rationing by price' (i.e. the richest get whatever is in short supply), with attendant inequity, suffering and resentment.

Under TEQs, everyone in the country would be guaranteed a free, equal entitlement to purchase their share of the available energy, regardless of their wealth. Those families who chose to be energy-thrifty could sell their surplus (at the prevailing national price) and those who wanted or needed more could buy it at that same price, with the process of buying and selling comparable with topping up a mobile phone or travel smart-card (e.g. London's Oyster card). Thus those who use more than their share would effectively pay those with low-carbon lifestyles for the privilege. This would leave everyone free to decide for themselves how they wish to live while defending the public against any need for carbon taxation and/or top-down regulation. Since poorer households use less energy/carbon on average than richer households, they would benefit financially from the introduction of TEQs (pronounced 'tex'). And since the purchase of lower-carbon energy would require fewer TEQs units, renewable energy supply would gain a powerful competitive advantage.

Most importantly, since the national price of TEQs units would be determined by the level of demand in the nation, the less energy the country as a whole uses the lower prices will be for everyone, creating a clear shared incentive across the economy for active, creative engagement with reducing our individual and collective dependence on fossil fuels.

A new academic paper on TEQs (which is currently passing through peer-review and of which I was lead author) emerged from the conference, but TEQs is not a new idea. It was developed in 1996, has been the subject of extensive international research, and has supporters in all the major UK political parties, as well as being Green Party policy. In 2008, a government feasibility study commissioned by David Miliband confirmed that there were no technical or technological obstacles to implementation, and that public acceptability was comparable with or slightly better than carbon taxes or international carbon trading, as TEQs were seen as fairer and more effective. However, it also argued that implementing a firm cap on emissions posed unacceptable political risks due to possible market effects, and so the scheme was dropped. Numerous influential research institutions including the government's own Environmental Audit Committee lambasted the decision, but the die was cast.

Yet, six years on, the market-based frameworks that the world has placed its faith in have failed us. We need to replace them with a framework within which the market is constrained. TEQs provides that radical framework, utilising markets for what markets do well - determining a value for a scarce resource - but not allowing or expecting them to regulate their own appetites. The heart of TEQs is a non-negotiable respect for the limits set by physical reality, alongside a framework to harness the collective genius of the populace in thriving within those limits.

In the UK we have the Climate Change Act, committing us to 50% carbon reductions by 2025, and a Climate Change Committee tasked with ensuring this budget is revised in light of the latest science. Hopefully the UN meeting in Paris next year will establish budgets for the rest of the world. And then eyes will turn to searching for carefully researched, well-established frameworks for allowing societies to thrive while guaranteeing that national emissions budgets are actually respected. That is what TEQs provides.

Without such a radical change of policy direction, we are likely to end up where we are headed.
Find out more: www.teqs.net

For Frequently Asked Questions on TEQs, see: www.teqs.net/faqs/

Blair Christmas Card: Tony & Cherie Want To Deck The Halls With Your Blood, Possibly

$
0
0
It's the beginning of December and the Blairs have sent out their Christmas card.

But rather than fill the world with festive cheer, it does in fact raise some rather alarming questions.

1) Firstly, why would a former Prime Minister with a net worth of around £20 million send out a card with such a bad picture on it?




2) Why is this year's card so secular? For a man who decided to go to war inspired by his faith, this card is particularly non-descript. It doesn't even say Christmas.

3) Why is Tony looking at us like we've just spilled his pint?




4) Is it perhaps just a look of a man with his wife's hand somewhere unspeakable?




5) Is this is all part of an evil plan to make us unable to sleep forever?




Of course, it is possible that this is just the card he's sending to all of his enemies.




6) Isn't it oddly reminiscent of that episode of Friends?




Despite almost everyone thinking this card was fake and a total joke, when the Huffington Post approached Tony Blair's office they confirmed that the card is actually real.




This picture of awkward, deer-in-the-headlights Tony with his un-ironed shirt is actually the one they chose which poses the most vexing question of all.

7) How bad must the other photos have been?!



New Year, New Career?

$
0
0
As we approach the end of 2014, Christmas is looming and everybody is looking forward to celebrating with family and friends,. it is natural for us to begin to reflect and look back on what we have managed to achieve in the year, giving ourselves time to think about our new year resolutions and ensure we have executed everything we promised we would do this time last year. As well as a time for nostalgia, it also gives us the chance to set out our main goals for 2015 and drive ambition throughout the business.

For me, Christmas presents itself as the perfect opportunity to ask my staff if they are happy, if they feel valued in their role and ultimately, why they still work for me, and you should be doing the same.

Take advantage of the Christmas social calendar, reconnect with and remotivate your staff. Remind them why your business is a great place to work, take their comments on board and if you're brave enough ask them the question: Why are you still working for me?

If their answer to the question is weak and you are not convinced by the response, you should be starting to think about how you can adapt your working environment to re-motivate them and provide an environment where they can flourish. Also, think about how you are communicating the businesses ambitions and vision for the future. If you own a business, or are in a leadership role, the business vision may be clear to you, but how well is that being communicated to your staff who are dealing with customers day to day?

Start with asking your employees what they do and don't like about working with you, how they work best and what you can do to help, and see if they are clear on their role within your organisation. By doing this you are diminishing any feelings of fear or anxiety and enhancing your personability.

Don't worry, I practice what I preach - just this week I had a one to one with Deepak our Chief Investment Officer. As my longest standing colleague, we have been working together for 10 years so we have inevitably built a very strong working relationship. When I put the question to him, he reaffirmed my vision of the company and his role within it and said:

"I like the challenge of working at Hamilton Bradshaw because every month is different, there is no limit to what I can do, I am able to take my own initiative and I know you trust me to make the right decision - but even if I don't, we both treat it as a learning curve. The rapid growth of HB also allows me to develop and aids my mental stimulation and curiosity".

It is really important you gain an understanding of how satisfied your employees are in their role and asking this question can help you do that. Remember, if someone is reluctant to give any feedback or they seem to have some underlying issues, they are a prime target for headhunters.

Motivating staff is the key to creating a happy, productive environment. At Hamilton Bradshaw, I ask all of my employees to send me a weekly report of their projects, highlighting what they have done to make a difference that week. I find this helps to establish purpose as my staff feel valued in their role and know that I am interested in their progress.

I find that working in an open planned office also adds to this mentality. The benefits of working collaboratively in an open planned office are endless for employees and employers alike. Working alone at a desk can be very lonely and disheartening. A lack of physical barriers in an office space makes it easier for employees to interact with each other on a regular basis and this constant intermingling encourages camaraderie and teamwork.

At HB, there is no hierarchy - I purposely sit opposite my communications team so I know what's happening with the brand at all times and this shows I am available for anybody to ask for advice or assistance without having to knock on a door or plan a formal one to one - this way interactions in the office are more frequent and informal.

This increased collaboration often lends well to business innovation, a key component in entrepreneurial environments like what we have at HB. When I asked Deepak, he agreed and said:

"One of the best things of working at HB is the fact that you sit across the room from me so when I'm working on a project, instead of spending an hour drafting a four page email and waiting aimlessly for a response, I can just pop over and ask for your thoughts."

In this sense, colleagues are offered autonomy and flexibility in their roles. Everybody is encouraged to take their own risks and new ideas are always welcomed. The only thing I ask of them is to have a plan of action and proof of value. This means they can go beyond their defined areas - they are not boxed in their job role. I always say the only time you're doing something wrong is when you're not doing anything at all.

So don't be afraid to be open and ask your employees why they are still around and why they still work for you. The insight you gather from this exercise could be the difference between your staff thinking 'new year new career' or 'new year I'm happy here'.

Egypt's Worrying Trend Towards Medicalising FGM

$
0
0
With the first ever prosecutions underway in the United Kingdom and Guinea-Bissau, an increased focus on strengthening the law in Kenya, and a rare conviction in Uganda, positive moves are being made in various locations to implement laws which ban female genital mutilation (FGM).

Under this increasingly optimistic backdrop, last Thursday's verdict in the case of Soheir al-Batea, a 13-year-old Egyptian girl who died after undergoing FGM in the Daqahliya Governorate, north-east of Cairo, was particularly disappointing.  Both Soheir's father and the doctor who carried out the mutilation were acquitted, despite the fact that a medical examiner's report, endorsed by Egypt's general attorney, confirmed that FGM had taken place.  The judge, who was appointed to the case only recently, seemed to discount this unbiased expert evidence and instead acquitted both men through writing in a court ledger.

Egypt has had a tumultuous past in terms of its battle to eliminate FGM.  In 2006, its two most senior Islamic clerics stated that FGM has no basis in religion.  Following this, in 2007, the country's medical professionals were banned from performing FGM, after a 12-year-old girl died.  It was this ban, backed by legislation introduced in 2008, that was used to prosecute Soheir's father and doctor in a very similar scenario, six years later.  Even with good laws in place, justice can continue to be evasive.  If laws are not implemented properly and the judicial system is not transparent, girls such as Soheir will continue to fall through the cracks.

According to Unicef, more than 27.2million Egyptian women and girls have been affected by FGM.  This represents 91% of the female population and is the biggest number for any one nationality.  Out of an estimated 100-140million affected by FGM globally, at least one in five is from Egypt.  While figures for younger women and adolescent girls seem to be decreasing slowly, this abuse continues to have broad national support from various quarters - including from professionals who are supposed to have a duty of care.

Unfortunately, as well as prevalence, Egypt also leads the world in terms of one of the biggest risks to the global anti-FGM movement - that of the increasing trend towards its medicalisation, which fundamentally contradicts WHO guidelines.  Incredibly, a 2012 academic document by Egyptian doctor Mohamed Kandil in 'F1000 Research', a peer-reviewed scientific journal, suggests there is "insufficient evidence to support the claims" that FGM Type 1 is harmful, when performed by medical practitioners.

Unicef suggests that 77% of the FGM which happens in Egypt is carried out by doctors or other medical professionals - an increase of over 100% since 1995.  Despite leading the way globally in terms of falls in prevalence, Kenya is also experiencing an increase in the medicalisation of FGM, while Indonesia has yet to fully ban it, although that country recently revoked its shocking 2010 regulation, which allowed medical professionals to legally perform FGM.  In 2010 too, Equality Now succeeded in reversing a decision by American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) to endorse Type IV FGM, when it suggested changes in the law to allow for a "ritual nick" or pricking of the clitoral skin.

All efforts to permit or make FGM supposedly "safer" conceal the severe violence it represents and hide its lifelong and life-threatening physical, emotional and psychological consequences.  Soheir's death tragically highlights FGM as an extreme violation of the human rights of girls and women with serious health risks, regardless of whether it is performed on her inside or outside a medical establishment.

Without strong messages from the Egyptian government, such as proper implementation of the law and swift punishment for the perpetrators, FGM may become more acceptable, with women's rights increasingly taking a back seat at all levels.  Part of the solution too is ensuring that health care providers are given comprehensive education and training on the health and human rights implications of FGM.

This week, we are working with local lawyers at the Centre for Egyptian Women's Legal Assistance (CEWLA) to ensure that Soheir gets justice at last - justice for one girl, but hopefully setting a precedent to help ensure that countless others are protected.  Egypt needs to decide which direction it would now like to take. 

Equality Now is working on the Soheir al-Batea case as part of its Adolescent Girls' Legal Defense Fund (AGLDF), created to help rectify the unique and devastating human rights abuses suffered by girls during adolescence.  The AGLDF supports and publicises strategically selected legal cases, diversified to represent the most common and significant human rights abuses of adolescent girls.

Cameron Follows Obama In Visiting Ancient Stonehenge Site

$
0
0
David Cameron has met with a group of immovable, grey, ageing relics… and it’s not members of the Tory far right.

The prime minister was in Wiltshire on Monday to unveil a £2 billion project to turn the A303 from a nasty little back road to a modern expressway, replete with a £1.2 billion tunnel around Stonehenge to provide uninterrupted views of the Wiltshire Downs.

The PM said visiting the ancient site reminded him of trips as a child, particularly being stuck in traffic around the historic monument (a structure so old it might actually pre-date Tory immigration policy).

cameron obama
Cameron and Obama have now both visited the Wiltshire site in 2014


Speaking to the Western Daily Press, he said: “This is the green light, it really is going to happen. The money is there. We’ve managed the nation’s budgets carefully so we can afford to do this.

“I think it’s not just what’s happening at Stonehenge but the whole of the expressway down to the south west I think is going to be really important for that region, its jobs, economy and prosperity to make sure that every region of the country benefits from the long-term economic plan.”

Cameron is the second world statesman to visit the English Heritage site in 2014 after Barack Obama toured the prehistoric monument on the way back from the Nato summit in Wales in September.

That visit resulted in what is was was the greatest piece of live-tweeting in West Country history when a mum of three (who runs 10K races dressed as a bumble bee), hiked up to the site hoping to get a glance of the President... only for Obama to wave, walk over, shake hands and have a picture taken.




What The Huffington Post UK's Beyond Belief Series Taught Us About Faith

$
0
0
Throughout November, The Huffington Post UK ran its Beyond Belief series, chronicling the remarkable lives of Britons who've taken on their faith to create a force for change.

beyond belief

Religion has had a bad press in recent months, and with the ever-rising number of abuse cases in the Catholic church, the opposition of faith groups to gay marriage, the beheadings committed in the name of Islam by Islamic State, and the endless rounds of violence between Israel and the Palestinians, it is perhaps natural more people are starting to turn away from organised religion.

According to our own research, more than half of Britons believe that religion does more harm than good, with less than a quarter believing faith is a force for good, with more than 60% of Brits - living in a nominally Christian country - saying they were not religious at all.

Across the pond, religion is said to be damaging politics, with both US parties imbibed with a sense of righteousness fueled by faith which can mean compromise is never on the table, especially if your opponent is the "anti-Christ".

world trade center
Islamist group Al-Qaeda attacked the World Trade Center in New York on 11 September 2001


But does religion deserve its bad reputation? We found academic studies consistently challenge the link between religious teachings and war or extreme violence. “Religion, unfortunately, provides a useful cover and powerful motivator for the evil-hearted," Rachel Woodcock, an author and academic featured in our series, writes.

So if religion gets a rough ride, and morality goes "beyond belief", who are the people leading the charge for change?

The Huffington Post UK's Beyond Belief series profiled religious radicals who broke the mould, and were championing progressive values and challenging core components of traditional culture and dogma to find a place for faith in the modern world. And to explore the origins of faith, whether that is in God, in culture, in community, an inner spirituality or in other human beings. People who have stood up to the orthodoxy, and shattered the stereotype.

The HuffPost/Survation research which launched the month-long series showed people are no longer viewing religious people as morally superior. More than 55% of those surveyed said that atheists are just as likely to be moral people than religious people.

Beyond Belief profiled 12 amazing people who inspire us not because of their faith, but because of the positive action it drives them to take. Here's what we learned from them.

An inspirational faith can be in anything - not just derived from traditional religion

ajahn
Ajahn Khemadhammo, the 70-year-old ordained monk, is a leading force in British Buddhism


Many of the religious radicals we profiled for Beyond Belief did not garner their inspiration solely from "God" in the most literal sense.

For Ajahn Khemadhammo, a former actor with Lawrence Olivier, who is now leading a Buddhist movement in prisons, inspiration comes from within, not an external, other-worldly being. “What became important was to try to understand myself, to understand life and what it’s all about. I wasn’t interested in being peaceful and happy, or anything like that – people come [to my hermitage now] wanting peace and happiness sometimes, but that never occurred to me," he says. "I didn’t feel that I wasn’t particularly happy. It was that knowledge and insight that really gripped me.

“I wasn’t required to believe something I didn’t understand. We don’t believe in God. It’s lovely."

Hannah Weisfeld, the Jewish pro-peace campaign who runs "two state solution" campaign group Yachad, also draws her inspiration from history and culture, rather than a traditional "God".

"The thing about support for Israel, the thing that gets lost in the conversation is that for a lot of Jews it’s about culture," she says. "Things like the revival of the Hebrew language [are] massive for Jews outside of Israel. The point is this: I actually think that it’s really important for non-Jews to hear that Zionism is not Israeli government policy."

Zionism, she says, has become warped from the real definition, which she says is "a belief in the right of the Jewish people to have a nation state."

And faith can also be connected to values beyond religion. For many who we spoke to, the faith they held was in humanity, beauty and in their relationships. "This belief in people underpins a lot of what I believe in and stand for - I’d also consider myself a Rawlsian [after the American philosopher John Bordley Rawls], which to me fits perfectly with humanism," says Lib Dem MP and self-proclaimed atheist Julian Huppert.

Inspiration can strike at anytime - and it can change everything

light and life
Girls before a meeting at a Light and Life convention




Jackie Boyd, the head of the UK's largest gypsy church Life and Light, found his faith behind a glue factory and used it to start major cultural reform and challenge fortune-telling and child marriage.

For Simon Bass, who works to save children from Christian-perpetrated child abuse, it was the death of his parents that brought him closer to God, and a sign when he was out running. "There was tremendous sense of peace and acceptance. I just knew that God was real. People say 'how do you know?' You know it or you don't know it. I just had that sense that 'Yes, God, I know you are real'" he says. But more than just a strong sense of belief, Bass had an urge to put his faith into action.

Japjeet Kaur Khalsa, who was featured in our piece focussing people who have changed their religion, said it was also through hardship, this time physical, that she found her Sikh faith, having been born a Catholic. She experienced a deep sense of purpose through yoga practice. "I did feel some uncomfortableness at first with the use of the word 'God'. I thought 'I'm just here for health problems, not God'.

"But through experiences I had through that yoga practice, my perspective started changing. I started recognising the mantras as if I had heard them before. They couldn't have come from anything I knew then. Through meditation, I had experiences that my self didn't end with my body."

There's no such thing as a typical 'religious' person - and traditional faith can work hand-in-hand with modern life

vicky beeching
Vicky Beeching says she is happier than ever


“I know what my relationship with God is," says Vicky Beeching, the former Christian rock star who came out and became an LGBT activists. She is adamant that coming out later in life, aged 30, mean she was confident enough to know she had a strong theological basis to says she is both gay and Christian. But because there was no one to tell her that very thing when she was younger, that is what drives her now, to be that voice for others.

“There was no one at all, and that’s what motivates me now,” she says. “Having someone say ‘this is ok’ and be a role model, was what I needed so badly. My life would have been so different, just a book or an article about what the bible really says about sexuality would have been gold dust."

Reform Judaism's Rabbi Laura Janner-Klausner, Britain's first female head of a faith, also says education and knowledge have given her the confidence to be part of Judaism's modernising force. “I am a Talmud scholar, I am a fluent Hebrew speaker, I know Israel inside out, my background is very much from the establishment. So, I think it’s very hard to marginalise me, though people try. I have no chip on my shoulder that I am ‘not as good’ as them,” she says, of her Orthodox colleagues.

Usha Sood, the Hindu barrister who has taken on forced marriages and abusive dowry claims, says she is confident in her own progressive values, and her faith, to never waiver. "If I had been in my 20s I might have been nervous, but when you get older you just lose the fear," she says. "You are more life-experienced, and you also have an eye on the goal, which is that these children need help, and I’m going to say my piece.”

Spires London's Pamela Mhlophe is a staunch Catholic, but it is the compassion she draws from that faith that leads her to help street sex workers with birth control, with clean needles, even sometimes with abortion. "As much as I don’t personally believe in it, I want the women to make the right choice, and to know I will support their choice. I will never propagate faith to anybody," she tells us.

Having faith does not always mean being dogmatic. Canon Andrew White, the Vicar of Baghdad, is prompted by his religious faith to call for further military force in Iraq, to fight the Islamic State onslaught, and to admit he was wrong about the first invasion. "I'm never as pious or bold as to say 'I'm not wrong'," he says. "I was wrong when I said we should go into Iraq.

"I was wrong because it was left far worse than it ever was before. But we caused this mess. We must do our part to clean it up and to do that, we have to be there. I knew the regime of Saddam was bad but I didn't realise afterwards we had nothing planned."

Even those we interviewed who are atheists said that religious values, teachings and art were important to modern life. "Religion is full of poetry and magic and was key to all the great art humans created in the West up until the Enlightenment, says comedian David Baddiel. "I don't think you can understand what it means to be human without understanding religion."

To challenge your own religious dogma can mean losing everything, or changing everything

leyla hussein
Leyla Hussein is challenging preconceptions about FGM, inside and outside her community


For those challenging the stereotypes within and outside of their faith, it can be tough. Her Muslim faith is the inspiration for Leyla Hussein's anti-female genital mutilation campaign, which also challenges her own community to speak up more. "The idea that FGM is a Muslim issue is a myth and religious leaders should be speaking out to dispel this myth, yet the majority are silent," she says.

“They say, ‘You are shaming Somalis, why are you speaking out? Why are you telling people about our dirty laundry?’ My response is: “If it’s dirty, someone needs to wash it!'"

Likewise, Asim Hafiz, the Muslim chaplain to the British army, met with strong resistance when he took on the role. "Everyone said to me, 'no, no, no, you can't work for the armed forces'. They didn't understand what the armed forces were about."

He, like Hussein, had to be the pioneer before attitudes could start to change. "It's been nine years now. It's become part of the furniture. It still raises eyebrows but it's rare now," Hafiz says.

On the other side of the coin, Muslim congressman Andre Carson's faith challenges everything you might expect of a US politician from the Bible Belt. But he says they go hand-in-hand. "What you'll find about Midwesterners is that they're less concerned about what religion a person is and more concerned with their value system and whether they'll deliver," he says, adding that as a "Muslim that comes from the African American experience, [I am] more concerned with civil and human rights, with education, with the global economy, creating jobs and how to repair broken infrastructure. These are issues Midwesterners relate to."

Young people are far more tolerant of religion - and it's young people of faith who are breaking the mould

ruth yimika awogbade
Ruth Yimika Awogbade started running Magnify events when she was 19


Our survey found young people are actually more likely to have a positive view of religion. Around 30% of 18-24 year old believe religion does more good than harm, compared to just 19% of 55-64 year-olds.

But they aren't so keen on sitting in a drafty church, and they've got little patience for the intolerances of traditional dogma. "We’ve had a few atheists and gay people come to our society," says Tyelle Render, one of the founders of a "new" kind of university Christian society Discover Life. "You do get sects where they don’t accept these people but it’s not how God teaches us. When they come to our society we say we love them and we accept them for who they are."

Some have even taken their faith into hitherto unknown quarters. Ruth Yimika Awogbade began her fashion magazine Magnify for modern females interested in feminism and faith, when much of the religion seems at first glance to come into conflict with what modern women want. "I wanted to give women the chance to see how faith could have a positive impact in every area of our lives," she says. "When I discovered my own faith it felt authentic and relevant to my life as a young woman and I wanted to share that in an engaging and unpressurised way."

Social media is also a new way to talk about faith, and for young people to debate their beliefs and find inspiration, even if they don't find God. We asked people to 'tweet their faith' and the response was massive - #HPBeyondBelief was used over 1,500 times.

These are the ways people draw inspiration from their faith that goes 'beyond' just a belief.




BEYOND BELIEF






Viewing all 23154 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>